New York Court of Chancery, 1846

Riker v. Darke

Riker v. Darke
New York Court of Chancery · Decided January 21, 1846
4 Edw. Ch. 668

Counsel

Mr. L. Livingston, in support of the demurrer, referred to Wood v. Chite, 1 Sandford’s V. C. Rep. 199 ; Alnat on Partition, 94., Mr. Sears, contra, cited Sears v. Heyer, 1 Paige’s C. R. 484.

Riker v. Darke

Opinion of the Court

The Vice-Chancellor :

It is conceded that the complainants, in virtue of the wife’s dower in the lands, cannot, on that ground, file a bill to partition the estate as between her and the heirs. But this bill does not proceed on that footing. It shows that the complainant is grantee of the legal estate of the defendant George Darke, as tenant by the curtesy initiate; and that is an estate or interest in land whereon a bill for partition may be filed.

The demurrer must be overruled, with costs.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.