New York Court of Chancery, 1846

Tripp v. Vincent

Tripp v. Vincent
New York Court of Chancery · Decided March 3, 1846
5 Sarat. Ch. Sent. 9

Counsel

W. A., Young, for appellants; ír, Taber & Birdseye, for respondent.

Tripp v. Vincent

Opinion of the Court

In this . case the chancellor decided that although the release of debt which is secured by a mortgage may discharge the of the mortgage upon the land, yet that where the debt is secured by a mortgage upon the land, as well as by the personal security of the mortgagor, the debt still exists as a valid claim against the land, although the creditor consents to discharge the personal liability of his debtor and to look to the land upon which the debt is a lien, for the payment thereof. That whether the debt itself was intended to be discharged, or the personal liability of the debtor only, is, in such cases, a question of fact arising from circumstances, or upon the construction of the instrument which is claimed to be a discharge of the debt.

Decree appealed from affirmed with costs.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.