New York Court of Chancery, 1847

Tallmadge v. Tallmadge

Tallmadge v. Tallmadge
New York Court of Chancery · Decided April 7, 1847
2 Barb. Ch. 290

Counsel

J. P. Cushman, the petitioner, in person., J. Blunt, for the complainant.

Tallmadge v. Tallmadge

Opinion of the Court

The Chancellor.

The complainant having examined Mr. Tallmadge as a witness, the defendant Cushman had a right to .cross-examine him, as a matter of course, and without an order to that effect. If he was examined as a party merely, he could only be examined as against himself, and could not be cross-examined by his own counsel. But if his testimony can, by any possibility, affect the rights of Cushman, he is made a witness in the cause, and consequently Cushman has a right to «cross-examine him.

-Order according to prayer of petition.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.