Irwin v. Muir
Opinion of the Court
—A motion is made to dismiss the appeal from the judgment of the Marine Court to this court on two grounds.
1. That the notice of appeal was not served on all the justices.
2. That the notice of appeal does not contain the grounds of the appeal.
In answer to the first objection, it is sufficient to say that the notice was served on the clerk. Service on the clerk is all that is required by the statute (Code, § 354), and if the process
If there remain any appeal to this court, such appeal can only be made by serving a notice, as is provided by section 353, specifying the grounds of appeal.
We held in Griswold v. Van Deusen (2 E. D. Smith, 178), that the want of such a notice was sufficient ground for the dismissal of an appeal, and we have also held, in July, 1856, that such a notice was amendable by inserting the grounds of appeal. The application of the decisions in these cases will dispose of this motion.
The motion must he granted, unless the appellant within ten days amend the notice of appeal by serving a new notice containing the grounds of appeal, and pay the costs of this motion, ten dollars.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.