New York Court of Common Pleas, 1860

Sorley v. Brewer

Sorley v. Brewer
New York Court of Common Pleas · Decided October 15, 1860 · Brady
1 Daly 79

Counsel

Jeremiah Larroque, for the appellants,, Martin & Smiths, for the respondents,

Sorley v. Brewer

Opinion of the Court

*83By the Court.

Brady, J.

It is unnecessary to state anything in addition to the reasons assigned by Judge IIiltost, at special term. The lien of the master being unquestionable on authority, the injunction was properly continued. The defeat danis are mistaken in supposing that by granting the injunction against the defendants, the plaintiffs are at liberty to collect the freight money at leisure. The order provides for the .appointment of a receiver to collect, and according to well-settled rules, the receiver must hold the fund collected subject to the order of the Court.

The order at special term should be affirmed, with $10 costs.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.