New York Court of Common Pleas, 1862

Jaroslauski v. Saunderson

Jaroslauski v. Saunderson
New York Court of Common Pleas · Decided November 15, 1862 · Brady
1 Daly 232

Counsel

Buckham, Van Cott & Bangs, for appellants., Abbott & Fuller, for respondent.

Jaroslauski v. Saunderson

Opinion of the Court

By the Court.

Brady, J.

In addition to the reasons assigned by Judge Hiltoh, in denying the motion to discharge the order of arrest in this case, it may be said that the cause of action is in tort, and that in such cases where the claim is sworn to positively, the order of arrest will not he disturbed on conflicting affidavits as to the right of action. The merits cannot be considered and disposed of upon affidavits.

The order of the Special Term must be affirmed with $10 costs.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.