Griffin v. Flock
Opinion of the Court
This is an appeal from a judgment entered upon the affirmance of a judgment entered upon a dismissal' of the plaintiff’s complaint at a trial term of the Marine Court.
The action was brought by the plaintiff to recover damages from the defendant,' who was a member of the police force of the Department of Parks of the City of New York, for making the arrest of the plaintiff without warrant, he at the time being guilty of a violation of the ordinances of the Department of Parks and thereby guilty of a misdemeanor, by chapter 290, Laws of 1871, section 6.
The claim made by the plaintiff is that the defendant had no right to make an arrest without warrant for the violation of the said ordinances, which violation was committed in the presence of the defendant, and relies for the support of this proposition upon the fact that the provisions
As a member of the police force of the City of New York has the power to arrest without warrant for violations of the municipal ordinances committed in his presence or within his view (Act of 1864 above cited), the members of the park police force have the same powers as to offenses committed within the territorial jurisdiction of the Park Department (L. 1871, c. 290, § 6). By the same act the Park Department is invested with power to make ordinances, and generally with “all the power and authority of the mayor, aldermen and commonalty of the City of New York, in respect to the public parks, squares and places in the said city.” The ordinances of the Park Department are not, therefore, in respect of the matters as to which the said department may legislate, to be distinguished in force and effect from corporation ordinances, and the manifest intention of the legislature was to confer on the park police the same powers, duties and authority
Judgment affirmed, with costs.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.