Lane v. Jacobs

After a re-examination of this case, ,we are of the opinion that the conclusion reached by uS on the previous argument should not. be disturbed. It does not appear that, any substantial fact has been disregarded, or any point of law overlooked, arid adhering to the rule expressed in Curley v. Tomlinson, 5 Daly, 283, we think this application should be denied.