New York Court of Common Pleas, 1890

Mooney v. New York El. R. Co.

Mooney v. New York El. R. Co.
New York Court of Common Pleas · Decided January 15, 1890
8 N.Y.S. 956; 29 N.Y. St. Rep. 1001; 1890 N.Y. Misc. LEXIS 1917 (New York Supplement)

Counsel

Davies & Rapallo, for appellant. Sackett & Bennett, for respondent.

Mooney v. New York El. R. Co.

Opinion of the Court

Per Curiam.

The chief judge, before whom this case was tried, and to whom the requests to find should therefore have been properly submitted, having, upon all the papers presented upon this appeal, determined that the defendant’s requests objected to were not properly presented to him, and all the facts being within his knowledge at the time of such determination, we see no good reason for disturbing the order made by him. The order appealed from should therefore be affirmed, with costs.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.