Diemel v. Scheveland
Diemel v. Scheveland
9 N.Y.S. 955; 30 N.Y. St. Rep. 860; 1890 N.Y. Misc. LEXIS 540
(New York Supplement)
Opinion of the Court
After a careful re-examination of the case, I have reached the conclusion that this application should be denied. It does not appear from the affidavit that any statute or decision has been overlooked in the conclusion reached. Neither does it appear that the questions presented by the learned counsel for the motion have been frequently passed upon, as shown by the authorities already cited. The motion is therefore denied, without costs.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.