New York Court of Common Pleas, 1890

Roberts v. Pike

Roberts v. Pike
New York Court of Common Pleas · Decided December 9, 1890 · Pryor
13 N.Y.S. 559; 19 N.Y. Civ. Proc. R. 422; 1890 N.Y. Misc. LEXIS 3237 (New York Supplement)

Counsel

Marshall P. Stafford, for plaintiff. William North, for defendant.

Roberts v. Pike

Opinion of the Court

Pryor, J.

The offer to refer claim may be by paroi. Lanning v. Swarts, 9 How. Pr. 434. Proof of refusal to refer is substantially uncontradicted, and this entitles plaintiff to'costs as a matter of right. Rooney v. Lenmon, 3 Law Bull. 101; Snyder v. Snyder, 26 Hun, 324. Accordingly, certificate of right to costs and an additional allowance of $100.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.