New York Court of Common Pleas, 1891

Sperry v. Hillman

Sperry v. Hillman
New York Court of Common Pleas · Decided February 2, 1891
13 N.Y.S. 271; 36 N.Y. St. Rep. 52; 1891 N.Y. Misc. LEXIS 1064 (New York Supplement)

Counsel

Howard A. Sperry, in pro. per., (Henry Cooper, of counsel.) Seligman t& Seligman, (Eugene Seligman, of counsel,) for defendants.

Sperry v. Hillman

Opinion of the Court

Per Curiam.

The plaintiff’s appeal should be dismissed. By giving the stipulation and entering the judgment for the amount to which it was reduced by the general term, he waived the right of appeal to this court. A party cannot avail himself of such parts of a judgment as are favorable to him, and appeal from those parts which are not. Grunberg v. Blumenlahl, 66 How. Pr. 62; Alexander v. Alexander, 104 N. Y. 643, 10 N. E. Rep. 37; Harris v. Taylor, 20 Wkly. Dig. 379; Canary v. Knowles, 41 Hun, 542. Defendants’ right of appeal to the general term of this court from the judgment entered, so far as it affirms, as reduced, the former judgment, is beyond ques*272tian. The plaintiff’s appeal is dismissed, with costs, and we direct that the defendants’ appeal be argued at the general term of this court to be held in March next.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.