New York Court of Common Pleas, 1891

Hattenbach v. Gundersheimer

Hattenbach v. Gundersheimer
New York Court of Common Pleas · Decided April 6, 1891 · Pryor
13 N.Y.S. 814; 37 N.Y. St. Rep. 509; 1891 N.Y. Misc. LEXIS 1693 (New York Supplement)

Counsel

Herring & Meyer, for appellant. Langbein <& Langbein, for respondent.

Hattenbach v. Gundersheimer

Opinion of the Court

Pryor, J.

The action is by the broker against the seller to recover a commission “of — per cent, of the selling price, if he sells my bakery, or sends a party that does buy it.” Such, in terms, was the written stipulation of the defendant. The plaintiff produced a purchaser, who did buy, and to whom the defendant did sell, the bakery. The defendant signed the contract of sale, and accepted $100 in part payment, but afterwards refused to carry out the sale, unless the buyer would secure the lease on the premises. This was not a term of the contract, and by insisting on it the defendant was the cause of the miscarriage of the negotiations; but the plaintiff had already fulfilled his engagement by presenting a purchaser who did buy, and to whom defendant did sell, by an agreement obligatory on both parties. It was then too late for defendant to escape liability to plaintiff for his commissions. Geoghegan v. Kelly, 11 N. Y. Supp. 704. The judgment is affirmed.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.