Sperry v. Hellman
Sperry v. Hellman
16 N.Y.S. 954; 1891 N.Y. Misc. LEXIS 2338
(New York Supplement)
Opinion of the Court
The motion papers do not disclose any of the grounds specified in rule 16 of the general term rules upon which a reargument may be allowed, and this motion is for that reason denied. The question involved in this appeal is, however, of sufficient importance to merit the attention of the court of appeals, and respondent may, if he desires it, have leave to appeal tothát court. No costs of this motion.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.