New York Court of Common Pleas, 1892

Hall v. Canary

New York Court of Common Pleas · Decided February 1, 1892

17 N.Y.S. 950; 43 N.Y. St. Rep. 970; 1892 N.Y. Misc. LEXIS 611 (New York Supplement)

Counsel

Albert I. Sire, for appellant. Edward Browne, for respondent.

Opinion of the Court

Per Curiam.

The only exceptions which appear in the record of this appeal and are urged for reversal of the judgment are those taken to the trial justice’s exclusion of certain questions addressed to the witnesses by defend*951ant’s counsel under objection by plaintiff’s counsel. These questions were so palpably incompetent that it seems a mere waste of time to discuss the exceptions taken to their exclusion. Judgment affirmed, with costs.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.