New York Court of Common Pleas, 1892

People ex rel. Ward v. Purroy

People ex rel. Ward v. Purroy
New York Court of Common Pleas · Decided March 7, 1892
18 N.Y.S. 953; 45 N.Y. St. Rep. 49 (New York Supplement)

Counsel

L. J. Grant, for relator. Wm. L. Findley, for respondents.

People ex rel. Ward v. Purroy

Opinion of the Court

Per Curiam.

To entitle appellant to reargument of the appeal herein, it must be made to appear that some question, decisive of the case, and which was presented by counsel upon the argument, has been overlooked by the ■court, or that the decision is inconsistent with some statute, or with a controlling decision, to which the attention of the court was not drawn through ■the neglect or inadvertence of counsel, (rule 16 of the general term of this •court;) and, as there is not even a pretense that either of the foregoing grounds exists, this motion must be denied. Motion for reargument denied, ■with $10 "costs.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.