New York Court of Common Pleas, 1892

Fulton v. Metropolitan Life Ins.

Fulton v. Metropolitan Life Ins.
New York Court of Common Pleas · Decided December 5, 1892 · Bischoff
20 N.Y.S. 989; 2 Misc. 55; 49 N.Y. St. Rep. 921 (New York Supplement)

Counsel

R. & W. Arnoux, for appellant. A. I. Sire, for respondent

Fulton v. Metropolitan Life Ins.

Opinion of the Court

Bischoff, J.

No sufficient ground is assigned in support of this motion. Reference to the opinions (19 N. Y. Supp. 660) disclosed that no novel question of law was involved in the appeal, which is our only justification for adding to the seriously lengthened calendar of the court of last resort. Hence the leave asked for, if granted, could result only in vexations, delay, and expense to the respondent Motion denied, with $10 costs.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.