New York Court of Common Pleas, 1893

Merritt v. Goodrich

Merritt v. Goodrich
New York Court of Common Pleas · Decided February 6, 1893 · Bischoff
21 N.Y.S. 949; 2 Misc. 578; 51 N.Y. St. Rep. 124 (New York Supplement)

Counsel

Merrill & Rogers, (Payson Merrill, of counsel,) for appellant., Marshall P. Stafford, for respondent.

Merritt v. Goodrich

Opinion of the Court

BISCHOFF, J.

The questions involved on this appeal do not in any respect differ from those determined by us in Bank v. Andrews, 21 N. Y. Supp. 948, the decision wherein is herewith handed down. In that case our conclusions were that the defendant’s liability to a creditor of the American Loan & Trust Com*950panv, imposed by its charter, for all debts of the corporation incurred while he continued to be a director, is enforceable in an action at law instituted by the creditor without joining other creditors or directors; and that the prior recovery of judgment against the company, and return of execution issued thereunder, were not essential to the maintenance of the action. The judgment of the general term of the court below should be affirmed, with costs. All concur.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.