New York Court of Common Pleas, 1893

Lindheim v. New York Elevated Railroad

Lindheim v. New York Elevated Railroad
New York Court of Common Pleas · Decided July 1, 1893
5 Misc. 585

Counsel

J. Aspinwall Hodge, Jr., for plaintiff (respondent)., R. L. Maynard, for defendants (appellants).

Lindheim v. New York Elevated Railroad

Opinion of the Court

Per Curiam.

Neither the amount of past damages awarded, nor the sum fixed by the referee as compensation for damage to the fee, upon payment of which the injunction directed to issue is to become inoperative, appears to be excessive. The evidence is identical with that in the Struthers case, and affects the next adjoining premises. The grounds urged for reversal on this appeal do not differ from those already considered and held by us to be invalid. Struthers v. N. Y. Elev. R. R. Co. et al., ante, page 239.

Judgment affirmed, with costs.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.