New York Court of Common Pleas, 1893

People v. Silverman

People v. Silverman
New York Court of Common Pleas · Decided July 1, 1893
56 N.Y. St. Rep. 897

Counsel

Be Lancey Nicoll, for the People ; H. F. Pepper, for def’ts.

People v. Silverman

Opinion of the Court

Per Curiam.

The prisoner having been surrendered, and, upon confession, convicted and fined, and having paid his fine, a case is presented for the cancellation of the judgment against his surety when the application comes *898properly before us. But our rule 13 requires that eight days’ notice shall he given the district attorney; and as, in this case, no notice whatever was given, the petition must be denied, witli leave, however, to renew. Application denied, with leave to renew on notice to the district attorney.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.