New York Court of Common Pleas, 1894

Carlson v. Winterson

Carlson v. Winterson
New York Court of Common Pleas · Decided April 2, 1894
28 N.Y.S. 20; 7 Misc. 689; 58 N.Y. St. Rep. 390 (New York Supplement)

Counsel

H. M. Hitchings, for appellant., E. F. Bulland, for respondent.

Carlson v. Winterson

Opinion of the Court

PER CURIAM.

The granting of this motion is discretionary, and the provisions of the Code of Civil Procedure respecting restitution on the reversal or vacation of a judgment or order are not exclusive. The party has his remedy by action. Haebler v. Myers, 132 N. Y. 363, 30 N. E. 963; Baylies, New Trials, 191. Since the submission of this motion it appears that the action has been retried in the court below, and that the trial has again resulted in a verdict and judgment for plaintiff. We deem it, therefore, a proper exercise of our discretion to deny restitution upon summary application therefor. ¡No costs of this motion.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.