New York Court of Common Pleas, 1894

Nolan v. Lewis

Nolan v. Lewis
New York Court of Common Pleas · Decided April 2, 1894
28 N.Y.S. 1137; 58 N.Y. St. Rep. 389 (New York Supplement)

Counsel

John Habenfeld, for appellant., Thomas Nolan, Esq., in pro. per.

Nolan v. Lewis

Opinion of the Court

PER CURIAM.

The plaintiff sued for the value of services rendered him to the defendant in the capacity of attorney and counselor. As to the fact of plaintiff’s employment by defendant, the record discloses a conflict of evidence with which we have nothing to do. That the services in question were performed is not disputed, and we find no reason for holding that the sum of $100, as found by the justice to be the reasonable value thereof, is excessive. No questions of law are presented by the record. Judgment affirmed, with costs.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.