New York Court of Common Pleas, 1894

Allen v. Clark

Allen v. Clark
New York Court of Common Pleas · Decided May 17, 1894
28 N.Y.S. 1142; 8 Misc. 680; 59 N.Y. St. Rep. 283 (New York Supplement)

Counsel

S. Lobenthal, for appellant., Earley & Prendergast, for respondent.

Allen v. Clark

Opinion of the Court

PER CURIAM.

It is clear that we cannot review the evidence in order to determine whether there is a preponderance on the one side or the other. The general term of the city court has passed upon that, and its decision is final. The claim that the verdict is against the preponderance of evidence admits that there is some evidence to support the verdict. There is no other question raised in the joints of the appellant, and the judgment must be affirmed, with costs.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.