New York Court of Common Pleas, 1894

Buttman v. Dennett

Buttman v. Dennett
New York Court of Common Pleas · Decided August 1, 1894
30 N.Y.S. 247; 9 Misc. 462; 61 N.Y. St. Rep. 89 (New York Supplement)

Counsel

W. S. Burt, for appellant., L. S. Wheeler, for respondent.

Buttman v. Dennett

Opinion of the Court

PER CURIAM.

We think that a restaurant keeper, in whose custody wraps and other articles of wearing apparel have been temporarily placed for safe-keeping, is liable as a bailee, under the rule laid down in Bunnell v. Stern, 122 N. Y. 539, 25 N. E. 910, and Bird v. Everard (Com. Pl. N. Y.) 23 N. Y. Supp. 1008; and that the judgment must therefore be affirmed, with costs.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.