Robinson v. Fincken

Memorandum.—It appears that the plaintiff’s exhibits Nos. 1, 2, 3 and 4, and defendant’s exhibits Nos. 1 and 2, are omitted from the return, which omission precludes any determination -as to the matters litigated at this time.

It is, therefore, directed that the appeal be reheard at the additional general term of this court to be held December 20, 1894, the return to. be amended in the particulars noted meanwhile. Krokomki v. North N. Y., etc., Asson., 54 St. Rep. 119.