Kettle v. Turl

The points severally alluded to by the appellant as having been overlooked by the court in its decision of the appeal appear from the opinion to have been duly considered. The case of Chisholm v. State, 141 N. Y. 246, 36 N. E. 184, does not limit Weston v. Troy, 139 N. Y. 282, 34 N. E. 780, cited in the opinion of the general term, but distinguishes it only, and nowise affects 'its application to the case at bar. Motion for reargument denied. No costs.