New York Court of Common Pleas, 1895

Farrell v. Haeger

Farrell v. Haeger
New York Court of Common Pleas · Decided December 27, 1895
36 N.Y.S. 1125; 15 Misc. 687; 70 N.Y. St. Rep. 901 (New York Supplement)

Counsel

Jacob Fromme, for appellant Haeger., Mashbir & Cukor, for appellant Mendel., James C. De La Mare, for respondent Farrell., Morris H. Gotlieb. for respondent Fliegman.

Farrell v. Haeger

Opinion of the Court

PER CURIAM.

The appeal in these cases brings up for review questions of fact only. The judgment in both cases seems to he supported by evidence, and, although the evidence was contradicted by the respective defendants, it was peculiarly the province of the court having the witnesses before it to determine the credibility of the witnesses and the weight to be given to their testimony. The judgment in each case should be affirmed, with costs to respondent.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.