New York Court of Common Pleas, 1895

Kettle v. Turl

Kettle v. Turl
New York Court of Common Pleas · Decided July 1, 1895
14 Misc. 637

Counsel

George II. Hart and John H. Whitmg, for motion.", W. W. Niles, opposed.

Kettle v. Turl

Opinion of the Court

Per Curiam.

Motion for resettlement of case. After argument and decision of an appeal it is too late for the defeated party to apply for a resettlement of the case in order to obtain a different statement of facts upon the ’record by the insertion of questions and answers which he deemed immaterial in making up his case, and which for the first time appear material to him after an adverse decision. . It might, ■be different if the proposed amendment were in support of a judgment, and where matter was improperly inserted or omitted by the "other party to the' controversy.

■ Motion denied, with ten dollars costs.

Present: Daly, Ch. J., Bischofe and Pbyob, JJ.

Motion denied, with ten dollars costs:

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.