New York Court of Common Pleas, 1895

Heerwagen v. Ritzmann

Heerwagen v. Ritzmann
New York Court of Common Pleas · Decided July 1, 1895
14 Misc. 643

Counsel

_ _ _ Wolf, Kohn & JJllman, for motion., Albert I. Sire, opposed.

Heerwagen v. Ritzmann

Opinion of the Court

Per Ouriam.

The present motion ■ does not conform to rule 16 of the General Term of this court with regard to motions for reargument.

Counsel, in effect, simply desires to present a more elaborate argument upon the exception which' the General Term deemed fatal to the judgment, and it does not appear that any question decisive of the case has been overlooked.

Motion denied, with ten dollars costs.

Present: Daly, Oh. J., BisonorF and Pbyob, JJ.

Motion denied, with ten dollars costs.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.