Martin v. Vedder
Martin v. Vedder
1 Lock. Rev. Cas. 385
Opinion of the Court
“ When a debtor advances money to his creditor, which is intended by both parties to be applied on the debt due, it is but another name for payment.”
Decree of Chancellor reversed accordingly.
93=* See Banter v. Garmo, 1 Sandford’s Ch. R. 384.
Lansing v. Woodworth, “ 43.
Craig v. Tappen, 2 “ 78,
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.