Court for the Trial of Impeachments and Correction of Errors, 1842

Bank of Utica v. Root

Bank of Utica v. Root
Court for the Trial of Impeachments and Correction of Errors · Decided June 15, 1842 · Nelson
4 Hill & Den. 535

Counsel

D. Burwell, for the defendants., if. if. Martin, for the plaintiffs.

Bank of Utica v. Root

Opinion of the Court

By the Court,

Nelson, Ch. J.

The affidavit was defective in not pursuing the language of the rule, (22 Wend. 644,)(a), and the motion must therefore be denied.

Ordered accordingly.

See Fitzburgh v. Truax, (1 Hill, 644, and note;) also Calder v. Lansing, (id. 212;) Richmond v. Cowles, (2 id. 359;) and the note to Britian v. Peabody, ante, p. 64, 5.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.