New York Court of Special Session, 1922

People v. Worth

People v. Worth
New York Court of Special Session · Decided December 12, 1922
40 N.Y. Crim. 202; 197 N.Y.S. 508

Counsel

Lester Emmett, for appellants., Dana Wallace, District Attorney (Joseph Lonardo, of counsel), for respondents.

People v. Worth

Opinion of the Court

Per Curiam:

The complaint in this case substantially charges the defendants with the offense of disrobing on an open beach. It appears from all the evidence in the case that what the defendants actually did was to take off their clothes in a secluded spot and *203to go in swimming in trunks or bathing suits, in a place which was private property and remote from any public highway and a considerable distance from the nearest dwelling, being a farm house, in the neighborhood.

We do not think that the evidence returned establishes the facts charged in the complaint or any disorderly conduct tending to a breach of the peace by the defendants.

Judgment of conviction reversed on the facts, complaint dismissed, defendants discharged and the fines paid by the several appellants ordered to be returned to them respectively. (All concur.)

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.