People v. Curtin
Opinion of the Court
The facts adduced upon the trial before the magistrate clearly established that the defendant operated the car in a reckless and negligent manner and at a fast rate of speed so as to endanger the life of the firemen and the fire apparatus herein and in fact did occasion damage to the fire apparatus and injury to the firemen.
This case is, therefore, clearly distinguishable from People v. Zambounis (251 N. Y. 94) and People v. Daus (135 Misc. 41).
Judgment affirmed.
All concur; present, Kernochan, P. J., Fetherston and Salomon, JJ.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.