In re Portington

District Court, S.D. New York
In re Portington, 19 F. Cas. 1082 (1875)
8 Ben. 175
Blatohford

In re Portington

Opinion of the Court

BLATOHFORD, District Judge.

I think the order must be vacated for the reason secondly assigned by the register. The matter of the compensation is for the court to adjust, and not for the clerk to tax as fees. But, I think that if the register has received any money, in excess of lawful compensation, he can, under general order No. 30, be ordered by tbe judge to pay it into court. In this view, the services and disbursements should be certified by the register, as he suggests.

Reference

Full Case Name
In re PORTINGTON
Status
Published