Healey v. Maracaibo
Healey v. Maracaibo
Opinion of the Court
The settlement made by the master and the agents of the steamship with the libelant at Maracaibo, as regards the wages then due Mm, the discharge of the libelant by the consul at that port as a part of that settlement, the allowance of a month’s extra wages, and the delivery to the seaman of a written order for the amount due him, including the extra wages, and the consul’s assurance to the libelant, as testified to,
Decree for the libelant, with costs.
Reference
- Full Case Name
- THE MARACAIBO. HEALEY v. THE MARACAIBO
- Status
- Published
- Syllabus
- Seamen’s Wages—Offset-—Alleged Smuggling—Fine—Settlement before Consul. Upon a. seaman’s discharge before the consul at Maracaibo and a settlement of his wages witli a month’s extra wages included in a written order given to the seaman upon the owners in New York for the payment of the balance duo and on suit by the seaman for 1he nonpayment, a claim io an offset was interposed for an alleged fine of $300, imposed upon the ship for the seaman’s alleged smuggling; but the facts, whatever they were, being known to the master prior to the settlement before the consul, and the order for the extra wages being unqualified, and the proofs as to the fine or any payment thereof being doubtful; held that the offset should not be allowed. (Syllabus by the Court.)