Lackritz v. Petersen

District Court, E.D. New York
Lackritz v. Petersen, 31 F. Supp. 415 (1940)
1940 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 3609

Lackritz v. Petersen

Opinion of the Court

HULBERT, District Judge.

Respondent moves for an order sustaining exceptions to the libel and invokes the 22nd Rule in Admiralty following 28 U.S. C.A. § 723.

It is the settled law that the owner of a shipyard who takes a vessel into his custody and control is a bailee. International Mercantile Marine S. S. Co. v. W. & A. Fletcher Co., 2 Cir., 296 F. 855; PanAmerican Petroleum Transportation Co. v. Robins Dry Dock & Repair Co., 2 Cir., 281 F. 97; United States v. Newport News. Shipbuilding & Dry Dock Co., D.C., 21 F.2d 112, reversed on other grounds, 4 Cir.,. 34 F.2d 100. Although the ultimate liability of the bailee must depend upon the establishment of negligence, Tomkins Cove Stone Co. v. Bleakley Transportation Co., 3 Cir., 40 F.2d 249, his failure to redeliver the vessel raises a presumption of negligence. Alpine Forwarding Co. v. Pennsylvania R. Co., 2 Cir., 60 F.2d 734.

Motion denied.

Reference

Full Case Name
LACKRITZ v. PETERSEN
Cited By
1 case
Status
Published