Bradley v. Waterfront Commission
Bradley v. Waterfront Commission
Opinion of the Court
In view of the history of adjudication relating to the Waterfront Compact, McK.Uneonsol.Laws N.Y. § 6700-aa et seq., N.J.S.A. 32:23-1 et seq. and since the likelihood of ultimate success upon the points here urged is remote, I have decided to deny the prayer seeking an order restraining the Waterfront Commission of New York Harbor, its two Commissioners and its Executive Director and General Counsel from enforcing Article IX and Article XII of the Waterfront Compact and Amendment to Regulation No. 7 and from performing other acts. In view of the fact that April 1, 1955 is the effective date of the Amendment to Regulation No. 7, I must resort to this short Memorandum, initially, with respect to that portion of the application which seeks a restraining order so that the parties may know at the earliest moment the disposition on this phase
. The matter was not brought on for argument before this Court until the afternoon of March 29,1955.
Reference
- Full Case Name
- William V. BRADLEY, individually and as President of International Longshoremen's Association (Independent), a duly organized labor union and unincorporated association of more than seven members, and James S. Castellano, on behalf of themselves and all others similarly situated v. WATERFRONT COMMISSION OF NEW YORK HARBOR, George Price Hays and Joseph Weintraub, as Commissioners for the States of New York and New Jersey, respectively, and as members of said Waterfront Commission of New York Harbor and Samuel M. Lane, Executive Director and General Counsel of said Waterfront Commission of New York Harbor
- Status
- Published