FILED □ of CLERKS OFFICE □ UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WS_DISTRICT COURT □ Va EASTERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK + Alu 8 2019 □ □□□ themselves and other persons similarly stuated, BROOKLYN OFFICE | ORDER Plaintiffs), © 5.1g.6v-380(ENV) (RLM) -against- JENNINGS GATE RESTAURANT INC., D/B/A STORYVILLE AMERICAN TABLE SANDRA FINELY * AND SHANNON FINLEY, In their individual capacities Defendant(s). □□ eee ene enna mene ennen nneceennenannne VITALIANO, D.J. | □ Plaintiffs Dania Bueso and Freddy Bueso commenced this action on January 19, 2018, against defendants Jennings Gate Restaurant Inc., Sandra Finley and Shannon Finley alleging violations of the Fair Labor Standards Act,

et seq. (“FLSA”) on behalf of themselves and all currently situated current and former employees who opt into the action pursuant to

(b), as well as under the New York Labor Law Article 19, §650 et □ seq., and the supporting New York State Department of Labor Regulations, 12 N.Y.C.R.R. Part

142 ("New York Labor Law"). Dkt. 1, as amended Dkt. 6. Plaintiffs sought to further amend or supplement the complaint (Dkt. 41) on October 16, 2018 and the parties participated inan unsuccessful mediation. After the case was transferred to this Court on March 8, 2019, the Magistrate Judge Roanne L. Mann conducted settlement conferences with the parties. The parties accepted the Court settlement proposal and subsequently, the Court referred the motion to □ supplement the complaint (Dkt. 41) and the motions to certify a class (Dkt. 64, Dkt. 66) to i Magistrate Judge Mann for a Report & Recommendation. See Order Referring Motion, dated

1

□

June 24 2019; Order Referring Motion, dated July 11 2019. Judge Mann issued her Report & Recommendation on the motion to certify a class (Dkt. 66) on July 29, 2019. Dkt. 69 (“R&R”). The R&R recommends that revised Order Preliminarily Approving Proposed Class Action Settlement (July 26, 2019) (Dkt. 68-3, annexed hereto) be granted and the revised Notice of Proposed Class Action Settlement (July 26, 2019) (Dkt. 68-2, annexed hereto) be approved. Judge Mann concluded that the proposed settlement is a free and reasonable resolution of the action and the proposed class settlement warrants preliminary approval pursuant to Cheeks vy. Freeport Pancake House, Inc.

(2d Cir. 2015), Judge Mann further concluded that under the relevant factors under Rule 23 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, the class certification and terms of the proposed class settlement are appropriate. (R&R at 2-3). □□ Notice of time to object to the R&R was given, but no party has objected within the □ prescribed time to do so. See R&R at 3. Discussion □ □ Where no party has objected to a report and recommendation, clear error review applies. See Dafeng Hengwei Textile Co. v. Aceco Indus. & Commercial Corp.,

, (E.D.N.Y. 2014). Having carefully reviewed the R&R in accordance with this standard, the | | Court finds it to be correct, well-reasoned and free of any clear error. The Court, therefore, ! adopts the R&R, in its entirety, as the opinion of the Court. | | Conclusion □ For the foregoing reasons, the R&R is adopted, in its entirety, as the opinion of the Court. The Court preliminarily approves the Class Action Settlement (Dkt. 68-3, annexed hereto), and approves the revised Notice of Proposed Class Action Settlement. The fairness hearing is respectfully referred to Judge Mann to be held on a date to be determined by Judge Mann.

So Ordered. Dated: Brooklyn, New York : August 7, 2019

/s/ USDJ ERIC N. VITALIANO ERICN. VITALIANO == * [| □□□ United States District Judge | !

□□

3 □