Ningbo Yang Voyage Textiles Co., Ltd v. Sault Trading
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK NINGBO YANG VOYAGE TEXTILES CO., LTD., a Chinese Limited Company, 1:18-cv-1961 (ARR) (ST) Plaintiff, Opinion & Order — against — Not for electronic or print publication SAULT TRADING, A/K/A SALUT TRADING INC., a New York Business Corporation, Defendant.
ROSS, United States District Judge: This Court has received the Report and Recommendation on the instant case dated September 10, 2019 from the Honorable Steven Tiscione, United States Magistrate Judge, granting in part and denying in part Ningbo Yang’s Motion for Default Judgment. Report and Recommendations (“R&R”), ECF No. 16. No objections to Judge Tiscione’s findings have been filed. Rather, on September 24, 2019, plaintiffs filed a supplementary report and affidavit presenting evidence pertaining to the calculation of damages. See Rep. and Aff. on Damages, ECF No. 17.
The Court reviews “de novo any part of the magistrate judge’s disposition that has been properly objected to.” Fed. R. Civ. P. 72(b); see also Brissett v. Manhattan & Bronx Surface Transit Operating Auth., No. 09-CV-874 (CBA)(LB), 2011 WL 1930682, at *1 (E.D.N.Y. May 19, 2011).
Where no timely objections have been filed, “the district court need only satisfy itself that there is no clear error on the face of the record.” Finley v. Trans Union, Experian, Equifax, No. 17-CV-0371 (LDH)(LB), 2017 WL 4838764, at *1 (E.D.N.Y. Oct. 24, 2017) (quoting Estate of Ellington ex rel.
Ellington v. Harbrew Imports Ltd., 812 F. Supp. 2d 186, 189 (E.D.N.Y. 2011)). Having reviewed the record, I find no clear error. I therefore adopt the Report and Recommendation, in its entirety, as the opinion of the Court pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1).
Accordingly, default judgment is entered against Sault Trading with respect to liability.
Counts Three through Five of the complaint are dismissed without prejudice. Ningbo Yang’s request for damages is denied at this time, but plaintiff is granted leave to submit additional evidence pertaining to damages. Its supplementary report and affidavit is remanded to Judge Tiscione for a determination of damages.
SO ORDERED.
_______/s/________________ Allyne R. Ross United States District Judge Dated: October 22, 2019 Brooklyn, New York
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.