Silver v. City of New York NYPD Bayside Queens Precinct

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK JACQUELINE SILVER, 15-CV-3462 (ARR) (ST) Plaintiff, Opinion & Order — against — Not for electronic or print SERGENT SCOTT SALESSANDRO, P.O. LUIGI publication GALANO, P.O. NICHOLAS KOSTAS, P.O.

EDWARD STINE, CAPTAIN JOHN DOE 5, Defendants.

ROSS, United States District Judge: This Court has received the Report and Recommendation on the instant case dated October 28, 2019, from the Honorable Steven L. Tiscione, United States Magistrate Judge.

ECF No. 96. No objections have been filed. The Court reviews “de novo any part of the magistrate judge’s disposition that has been properly objected to.” Fed. R. Civ. P. 72(b); see also Brissett v. Manhattan & Bronx Surface Transit Operating Auth., No. 09-CV-874 (CBA)(LB), 2011 WL 1930682, at *1 (E.D.N.Y. May 19, 2011). Where no timely objections have been filed, “the district court need only satisfy itself that there is no clear error on the face of the record.” Finley v. Trans Union, Experian, Equifax, No. 17-CV-0371 (LDH)(LB), 2017 WL 4838764, at *1 (E.D.N.Y. Oct. 24, 2017) (quoting Estate of Ellington ex rel. Ellington v. Harbrew Imports Ltd., 812 F. Supp. 2d 186, 189 (E.D.N.Y. 2011)). Having reviewed the record, I find no clear error. I therefore adopt the Report and Recommendation, in its entirety, as the opinion of the Court pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1).

Accordingly, plaintiff’s Motion for Relief from an Order or Judgment is denied.

SO ORDERED.

_______/s/________________ Allyne R. Ross United States District Judge Dated: November 12, 2019 Brooklyn, New York