Vega v. Superintendent

District Court, S.D. New York

Vega v. Superintendent

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK -------------------------------------------------------x

JESUS VEGA,

Petitioner,

-v- No. 16 CV 1190-LTS-DCF

SUPERINTENDENT,

Respondent.

-------------------------------------------------------x

ORDER ADOPTING REPORT & RECOMMENDATION

The Court has reviewed Magistrate Judge Debra Freeman’s June 11, 2019, Report and Recommendation (the “Report”) (docket entry no. 25) which recommends that pro se Petitioner Jesus Vega’s petition for a writ of habeas corpus pursuant to

28 U.S.C. § 2254

(docket entry no. 2) be dismissed in its entirety. No objections to the Report have been received. In reviewing a report and recommendation, a district court “may accept, reject, or modify, in whole or in part, the findings or recommendations made by the magistrate judge.”

28 U.S.C.A. § 636

(b)(1)(C) (LexisNexis 2017). “In a case such as this one, where no timely objection has been made, a district court need only satisfy itself that there is no clear error on the face of the record.” Johnson v. New York University School of Education, No. 00 Civ. 8117,

2003 WL 21433443

, at *1 (S.D.N.Y. June 16, 2003) (internal quotation marks omitted). The Court has reviewed carefully Magistrate Judge Freeman’s thorough and well- reasoned Report and Recommendation and finds no clear error. The Court therefore adopts the Report in its entirety for the reasons stated therein. Accordingly, Petitioner’s petition for a writ of habeas corpus pursuant to

28 U.S.C. § 2254

is dismissed. The Court also adopts Judge Freeman’s recommendation that the Court decline to issue a certificate of appealability pursuant to

28 U.S.C. §2253

(c)(1)(A) because Petitioner has not made a substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right, a certificate of appealability should not be issued. See

28 U.S.C. § 2253

; Middleton v. Attorneys General of States of N.Y. & Pennsylvania,

396 F.3d 207, 209

(2d Cir. 2005) (per curiam). The Court certifies pursuant to

28 U.S.C. § 1915

(a)(3) that any appeal from this order would not be taken in good faith. See Coppedge v. United States,

369 U.S. 438, 444

(1962). This Order resolves docket entry no. 2. The Clerk of Court is requested to enter judgment accordingly.

SO ORDERED.

Dated: New York, New York July 26, 2019

/s/ Laura Taylor Swain LAURA TAYLOR SWAIN United States District Judge

Copies mailed to:

Jesus Vega 12-A-1245 Southport Correction Facility P.O. Box 2000 Pine City, NY 14871-2000

Jesus Vega 12-A-1245 1156 Rt. 374 Dannemora, NY 12929

Reference

Status
Unknown