UsBCSpNY_ UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DOCUMENT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK ELECTRONICALLY FILED aerate re ~--55-4cre ----X DOC#: THe TRROELERS VEAEPTY CRS. Dave FLED

>. SF HAL Ck ca Plaitifi(s), -against- /otfoo WAK) VER Chor? a4 & Defendant(s) - wom tt te ee ee □□□ □□ He eee eee He HH HX

ORDER

LEWIS A. KAPLAN, District Judge. Jurisdiction is invoked pursuant to

. The complaint fails adequately to allege the existence of subject matter jurisdiction because, perhaps among other things, it fails adequately to allege: O The citizenship of one or more natural persons. See, e.g., Sun Printing & Publishing Ass’n v. Edwards,

(1904); Leveraged Leasing Administration Corp.v. PacifiCorp Capital, Inc.,

(2d Cir. 1996). O The citizenship of one or more corporations. See

(c)(1). Oo The citizenship of one or more partnerships. See Carden v. Arkoma Assocs.,

(1990). a The citizenship of one or more limited liability companies. See Handlesman □□□ Bedford Village Green Assocs. L.P.,

(2d Cir. 2000). O The nature and citizenship of one or more business entities. O The timely removal of the action from state court. nfs □□□ Absent the filing, on or before of an amended complaint adequately alleging the existence of subject matter jurisdiction, the action will be dismissed or, if removed, remanded. SO ORDERED. Dated: {C [cl (7

Lewis A. Kaplan United States District Judge