Frost v. CVR Associates Inc.
Frost v. CVR Associates Inc.
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK YVONNE FROST, Plaintiff, 19-CV-10632 (CM) “against: ORDER OF DISMISSAL CVR ASSOCIATES INC, et al., UNDER
28 U.S.C. § 1651Defendants. COLLEEN McMAHON, Chief United States District Judge: On November 7, 2019, Plaintiff was barred from filing any new action in forma pauperis (IFP) without first obtaining from the Court leave to file. See Frost v. City of New York (HRA), No. 1:19-CV-8936, 5 (CM) (S.D.N.Y. Nov. 7, 2019). Plaintiff files this new pro se case, seeks IFP status, and has not sought leave from the Court. This action is therefore dismissed without prejudice for Plaintiff’s failure to comply with the November 7, 2019 order. The Clerk of Court is directed to assign this matter to my docket, and note service on the docket.' The Court certifies, pursuant to
28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)(3), that any appeal from this order would not be taken in good faith and therefore in forma pauperis status is denied for the purpose of an appeal. See Coppedge v. United States,
369 U.S. 438, 444-45(1962). SO ORDERED. Dated: November 18, 2019 , New York, New York hie. Iu Chief United States District Judge
' Plaintiff consents to receive electronic service in this action.
Reference
- Status
- Unknown