Conner v. Nobull, LLC
Conner v. Nobull, LLC
Trial Court Opinion
USDC-SDNY DOCUMENT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK DATE FILED: [7/3 /(4 MARY CONNER, individually and as the representative of a class of similarly situated persons, Plaintiff, No. 19-CV-9104 (RA) v. ORDER NOBULL, LLC, Defendant.
RONNIE ABRAMS, United States District Judge: The Court has been informed that the parties have reached a settlement in this case. Accordingly, it is hereby: ORDERED that the above-captioned action is discontinued without costs to any party and without prejudice to restoring the action to this Court’s docket if the application to restore the action is made within forty-five (45) days. Any application to reopen this action must be filed within forty-five (45) days of this order, and any application filed thereafter may be denied solely on that basis. If the parties seek to have the Court retain jurisdiction to enforce a settlement agreement, the terms of the agreement must be placed on the public record and “so ordered” by the Court within the same thirty-day period. See Hendrickson v. United States,
791 F.3d 354, 358(2d Cir. 2015). The Clerk of Court is respectfully directed to close this case. SO ORDERED. af] Dated: December 3, 2019 | { New York, New York . | “RomieAbams United States District Judge
Reference
- Status
- Unknown