District Court, S.D. New York, 2019

Cantero v. Mid-Hudson Psychiatric Forensic Center

Cantero v. Mid-Hudson Psychiatric Forensic Center
District Court, S.D. New York · Decided December 10, 2019
Cantero v. Mid-Hudson Psychiatric Forensic Center

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK JOSE LUIS CANTERO, Plaintiff, -against- 19-CV-11167 (CM) MID-HUDSON PSYCHIATRIC FORENSIC ORDER DIRECTING PAYMENT OF FEE CENTER; ADOBI UNKNOWN, SHTA OR IFP APPLICATION (TEAM ASSISTANT); JOSEPH UNKNOWN, SHTA (TEAM ASSISTANT), Defendants.

COLLEEN McMAHON, Chief United States District Judge: Plaintiff brings this action pro se. To proceed with a civil action in this Court, a plaintiff must either pay $400.00 in fees – a $350.00 filing fee plus a $50.00 administrative fee – or, to request authorization to proceed in forma pauperis (IFP), that is, without prepayment of fees, submit a signed IFP application. See 28 U.S.C. §§ 1914, 1915.

Plaintiff submitted the complaint without the filing fees or an IFP application. Within thirty days of the date of this order, Plaintiff must either pay the $400.00 in fees or submit the attached IFP application. If Plaintiff submits the IFP application, it should be labeled with docket number 19-CV-11167 (CM). If the Court grants the IFP application, Plaintiff will be permitted to proceed without prepayment of fees. See 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)(1).

The Clerk of Court is directed to assign this matter to my docket, mail a copy of this order to Plaintiff, and note service on the docket. No summons shall issue at this time. If Plaintiff complies with this order, the case shall be processed in accordance with the procedures of the Clerk’s Office. If Plaintiff fails to comply with this order within the time allowed, the action will be dismissed.

The Court certifies under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)(3) that any appeal from this order would not be taken in good faith, and therefore IFP status is denied for the purpose of an appeal. Cf Coppedge v. United States, 369 U.S. 438, 444-45 (1962) (holding that appellant demonstrates good faith when seeking review of a nonfrivolous issue).

SO ORDERED.

Dated: December 10, 2019 New York, New York hi hb hich Chief United States District Judge

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.