Megginson v. Camron

District Court, S.D. New York

Megginson v. Camron

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT ELECTRONICALLY FILED DOC #: _________________ SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK DATE FILED: 12/13/2019 ----------------------------------------------------------------- X : MICHAEL E. MEGGINSON, : : Plaintiff, : 1:18-cv-7206-GHW : -v - : ORDER : DEPT. CAMRON; DEPT. LUIS; DEPT. : CARTER; 1 STAR CHIEF JENNINGS; : NEW YORK CITY DEPARTMENT OF : CORRECTIONS. : : Defendants. : : ----------------------------------------------------------------- X GREGORY H. WOODS, District Judge: On November 27, 2019, Plaintiff wrote the Court a letter moving, among other things, for summary judgment against Robert Molina. Dkt. No. 40. This letter was captioned with “18cv7206,” and so was filed in this action, Megginson v. Camron, et al. Because Plaintiff’s letter references Defendant Molina, however, the Court understands this letter as an application in 1:18- cv-05808-GHW, Megginson v. Molina, et al. Mr. Megginson’s letter has therefore been docketed in that case and the Court understands that no further action is required of Defendants in this matter. The Court certifies under

28 U.S.C. § 1915

(a)(3) that any appeal from this order would not be taken in good faith, and therefore in forma pauperis status is denied for the purpose of an appeal. Cf. Coppedge v. United States,

369 U.S. 438, 444-45

(1962) (holding that an appellant demonstrates good faith when he seeks review of a nonfrivolous issue). The Clerk of Court is directed to mail a copy of this order to Plaintiff by first class and certified mail. SO ORDERED.

Dated: December 8, 2019 New York, New York GRE . WOODS United States District Judge

Reference

Status
Unknown