Diaz v. Pro-Direct Sport, Inc.

District Court, S.D. New York

Diaz v. Pro-Direct Sport, Inc.

Trial Court Opinion

ELECTRONICALLY FILED UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DOC#: SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK | DATE FILED: 12 /{4{(4 EDWIN DIAZ, on behalf of himself and all others similarly situated, Plaintiff, No. 19-CV-7894 (RA) v. ORDER PRO-DIRECT SPORT, INC., Defendant.

RONNIE ABRAMS, United States District Judge: It has been reported to the Court that this case has been settled in principle. Accordingly, it is hereby: ORDERED that the above-captioned action is discontinued without costs to any party and without prejudice to restoring the action to this Court’s docket if the application to restore the action is made within thirty (30) days. Any application to reopen this action must be filed within thirty (30) days of this order, and any application filed thereafter may be denied solely on that basis. If the parties seek to have the Court retain jurisdiction to enforce a settlement agreement, the terms of the agreement must be placed on the public record and “so ordered” by the Court within the same thirty-day period. See Hendrickson v. United States,

791 F.3d 354, 358

(2d Cir. 2015). It is further ORDERED that the initial conference scheduled for December 20, 2019 is hereby adjourned sine die. The Clerk of Court is respectfully directed to close this case. SO ORDERED. Dated: December 13, 2019 kc New York, New York

RonnieAbrams sts—S United States District Judge

Reference

Status
Unknown