Securities and Exchange Commission v. Telefonaktiebolaget LM Ericsson

District Court, S.D. New York

Securities and Exchange Commission v. Telefonaktiebolaget LM Ericsson

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT USDC SDNY SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK DOCUMENT anna anna □□□ KX ELECTRONICALLY FILED : DOC #: SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE DATE FILED: 12/13/2019 COMMISSION, Plaintiff, | -v- 1:19-cvy-11214-GHW TELEFONAKTIEBOLAGET LM ERICSSON,,. ORDER Defendant. □□ KX GREGORY H. WOODS, United States District Judge: The Court declines to consider the parties’ proposed order at Dkt. No. 7. Plaintiff failed to follow the Court’s Individual Rules—specifically Rule 1(F), which requires, z#ter alia, that “immediately following the filing of any proposed order or stipulation, parties are directed to submit a joint letter to the Court.” In this case, the Court expects that any letter would provide the legal and factual basis for the Court to conclude that the SEC’s proposed final judgment is fair and reasonable, and that it would not disserve the public interest. See SEC. v. Citigroup Global Markets, Ine,

752 F.3d 285, 294

(2d Cir. 2014). The submission should specifically address the factors described in Crtigroup. See

id. at 294-95

, Additionally, counsel for Defendant is directed to enter a notice of appearance in this case. Counsel for Plaintiff is directed to serve this order on Defendant and to retain proof of service, SO ORDERED. Dated: December 13, 2019 New York, New York f ( : □ { Doren GREG: . WOODS United States District Judge

Reference

Status
Unknown