Frost v. World Trade Center
Frost v. World Trade Center
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK YVONNE FROST, Plaintiff, . 19-CV-10903 (CM) -against- WORLD TRADE CENTER; UNITED ORDER OF DISMISSAL STATES SD COURT; CITY OF NEW YORK UNDER
28 U.S.C. § 1651(HRA), Defendants. COLLEEN McMAHON, Chief United States District Judge: In an order dated November 7, 2019, and entered the next day, the Court barred Plaintiff from filing any new action in forma pauperis (IFP) without first obtaining from the Court leave to file. See Frost v. City of New York (HRA), ECF 1:19-CV-8936, 6 (S.D.N.Y. Nov. 7, 2019). On November 22, 2019, Plaintiff filed this new pro se action in which she seeks to proceed IFP. But she has not sought leave from the Court to file this action. The Court therefore dismisses this action without prejudice for Plaintiff's failure to comply with the November 7, 2019 order. The Clerk of Court is directed to assign this matter to my docket and note service on the docket. Plaintiff has consented to receive electronic service of Court filings. (ECF No. 3.) The Court certifies, pursuant to
28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)(3), that any appeal from this order would not be taken in good faith and therefore IFP status is denied for the purpose of an appeal. See Coppedge v. United States,
369 U.S. 438, 444-45(1962). SO ORDERED. Dated: December 18, 2019 New York, New York hie l Wik COLLEEN McMAHON Chief United States District Judge
Reference
- Status
- Unknown