UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK YVONNE FROST, Plaintiff, 19-CV-11259 (CM) ~against- ORDER OF DISMISSAL CITY OF NEW YORK (HRA), ET AL., UNDER

Defendants. COLLEEN McMAHON, Chief United States District Judge: On November 7, 2019, Plaintiff was barred from filing any new action in forma pauperis without first obtaining from the Court leave to file. See Frost v. City of New York (HRA), ECF 1:19-CV-8936, 6 (S.D.N.Y. Nov. 7, 2019). Plaintiff files this new pro se case, seeks IFP status, and has not sought leave from the Court. The Court dismisses this action without prejudice for Plaintiff's failure to comply with the November 7, 2019 order. The Clerk of Court is directed to assign this matter to my docket, transmit a copy of this order to Plaintiff,! and note service on the docket. The Court certifies under

(a)(3) that any appeal from this order would not be taken in good faith, and therefore IFP status is denied for the purpose of an appeal. Cf Coppedge v. United States,

(1962) (holding that an appellant demonstrates good faith when he seeks review of a nonfrivolous issue). SO ORDERED. Dated: December 17, 2019 New York, New York hie. Iu Chief United States District Judge

' Plaintiff consents to receive electronic service.